Cement Roofs vs. Wooden Roofs: Making the Best Choice for Florida’s Climate


When it comes to roofing materials, homeowners in Florida face unique challenges due to the state’s tropical climate, which includes high humidity, intense sunlight, and frequent rainstorms. Choosing the right roofing material is essential for protecting homes from weather-related damage and ensuring long-term durability. We are going to compare cement roofs & wooden roofs to determine which option is better suited for Florida’s climate, helping homeowners make up-to-date decisions when it comes to roof replacement or installation. Visit A Old Time Roofing now, to get all of your roofing related problems removed from your life.

Table of Contents

Cement Roofs:

Cement roofs, also known as concrete tile roofs, are a popular choice for homeowners seeking durability and longevity. Made from a mixture of cement, sand, and water, concrete tiles offer several advantages in Florida’s climate:

  • Durability: Cement roofs are highly durable and can withstand the harsh elements of Florida’s climate, including high winds, heavy rain, and UV exposure. Concrete tiles are resistant to rot, decay, and insect damage, making them an ideal choice for areas prone to moisture and humidity.
  • Fire Resistance: Cement roofs have excellent fire-resistant properties, providing added protection against wildfires and accidental fires. This is especially important in Florida, where the risk of wildfires is a concern, particularly during dry seasons.
  • Thermal Performance: Cement roofs offer superior thermal performance, helping to regulate indoor temperatures and reduce energy costs. Concrete tiles have excellent insulating properties, keeping homes cooler in the hot Florida sun and reducing the need for excessive air conditioning.
  • Longevity: Cement roofs have a long lifespan, typically lasting 50 years or more with proper maintenance. This long-term durability makes them a cost-effective investment for homeowners looking for a roofing solution that will stand the test of time.

Wooden Roofs:

Wooden roofs, typically constructed using cedar or redwood shingles or shakes, offer a traditional and rustic aesthetic. While wooden roofs have their own set of advantages, they may not be the best choice for Florida’s climate:

  • Vulnerability to Moisture: Wooden roofs are susceptible to moisture damage, rot, and decay, especially in humid climates like Florida. High humidity levels and frequent rainstorms can accelerate the deterioration of wood shingles, leading to premature failure and the need for frequent repairs or replacement.
  • Fire Risk: Wooden roofs pose a higher fire risk compared to cement roofs. Wood shingles are combustible and can easily ignite in the event of a fire, putting homes and occupants at risk, particularly in areas prone to wildfires or lightning strikes.
  • Maintenance Requirements: Wooden roofs require regular maintenance, including cleaning, sealing, and treating with preservatives to protect against moisture and decay. Failure to properly maintain a wooden roof can result in costly repairs and premature replacement.
  • Lifespan: While wooden roofs can last up to 30 years with proper maintenance, they generally have a shorter lifespan compared to cement roofs. In Florida’s climate, where moisture and humidity levels are high, wooden roofs may deteriorate more quickly, requiring more frequent replacement.


In brief, while both cement roofs and wooden roofs have their own set of advantages and disadvantages, cement roofs are generally better suited for Florida’s climate due to their durability, fire resistance, thermal performance, and longevity. Cement roofs offer superior protection against moisture, UV exposure, and fire, making them a wise investment for homeowners looking for a reliable and long-lasting roofing solution in Florida. Before making a decision, homeowners should consider factors such as budget, aesthetics, and maintenance requirements to choose the roofing material that best meets their needs and preferences.

Leave A Reply